WHISTLEBLOWERS

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, August 30, 2013

NSA MISLEADS PUBLIC W/O TECHNICALLY LYING

Posted on 5:02 PM by Unknown
FROM ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION


An Illustration of How the NSA Misleads the Public Without Technically Lying

The Wall Street Journal published an important investigation last week, reporting that the National Security Agency (NSA) has direct access to many key telecommunications switches around the country and “has the capacity to reach roughly 75% of all U.S. Internet traffic in the hunt for foreign intelligence, including a wide array of communications by foreigners and Americans.” Notably, NSA officials repeatedly refused to talk about this story on theirconference call with reporters the next day. Instead the Director of National Intelligence and the NSA released a statement about the story later that evening.
If you read the statement quickly, it seems like the NSA is disputing the WSJ story. But on careful reading, they actually do not deny any of it. As we’ve shown before, often you have to carefully parse NSA statements to root out deception and misinformation, and this statement is no different. They’ve tried to deflect an accurate story with their same old word games. Here’s a breakdown:
The NSA does not sift through and have unfettered access to 75% of United States online communications...The report leaves readers with the impression that the NSA is sifting through as much as 75% of the United States online communications, which is simply not true.
Of course, the Wall Street Journal never says the NSA “sifts through” 75% of US communications. They reported the NSA’s system “has the capacity to reach roughly 75% of all U.S. Internet traffic.” The NSA's new term “sift” is undefined, but regardless of what the NSA is doing or not doing to 75% of Americans’ emails, they do have the technical capacity to search through it for key words—which they do not deny.
In its foreign intelligence mission, and using all its authorities, NSA “touches” about 1.6%, and analysts look at 0.00004% of the world’s Internet traffic.
See what they did there? The Wall Street Journal was talking about US-only communicationstraffic, not the world’s total Internet traffic. The vast majority of the world’s Internet traffic is video—streaming and downloads. According to a study done by Cisco, video made up more than half of all web traffic in 2012—and that does not include peer-to-peer sharing. By 2017, they predict 90% of all Internet traffic will be video.
As Jeff Jarvis aptly documented, the NSA can vacuum up an extraordinary percentage of the world’s (and American) communications while only touching 1.6% of total Internet traffic.
Oh, and that 0.00004%? That math may be wrong too. The Atlantic Wire double-checked the NSA’s numbers when they first used that stat and determined the NSA’s math was off by an order of magnitude – it actually searches ten times more than they say they do.1
The assistance from the providers, which is compelled by the law, is the same activity that has been previously revealed as part of Section 702 collection and PRISM.
First, notice that they are conflating PRISM—which involves collection from Internet companies like Facebook—with the “upstream” collection the Wall Street Journal reports on: telecommunications companies like AT&T that give the NSA direct access to the fiber optic cables that all Internet traffic travels over. Here’s the NSA’s own leaked graphic explaining the difference:
                 
Second, siphoning off large portions of Internet traffic directly from the Internet backbone is not “compelled by law.” In fact, as EFF argued in court for years, the telecoms’ participation in this program with the NSA was both illegal and unconstitutional. Obviously, they knew it, because that’s why Congress passed retroactive immunity for companies like AT&T in 2008. But that immunity only extended to the telecom, and EFF’s case against the ongoing illegal surveillance continues.
Section 702 specifically prohibits the intentional acquisition of any communications when all parties are known to be inside the US.
Yes, Section 702 prohibits the intentional acquisition of US communications, but once US communications are in an NSA database—which happens often—the NSA can search them without a warrant, as documents recently published by the Guardian revealed. Unknown or anonymous people are assumed to be foreign, meaning many US people will be caught up in the dragnet.
The law specifically prohibits targeting a US citizen without an individual court order based on a showing of probable cause.
We’ve previously dissected the NSA’s warped definition of “target”, where they only have to be 51% sure the person they’re spying on is foreign. Additionally, a host of loopholes exist that allow the NSA to keep US communications if they’re encrypted, if there’s evidence of a crime, and more.
And as the New York Times reported on its front page two weeks ago, officials admit the NSA is “searching the contents of vast amounts of Americans’ e-mail and text communications into and out of the country” under the guise of looking for information about targets, not just communications to targets.
If that communications involves a US person, NSA must follow Attorney General and FISA court approved "minimization procedures" to ensure the Agency protects the privacy of US persons.
Those “minimization procedures” do not ensure that the NSA protects privacy.  Rather, they are woefully inadequate, primarily concerned with minimizing the amount of data to be removed from the database, and expanding on the circumstances under which the NSA can keep the data and share it with other agencies.
So there you have it: how the NSA pretends to deny a media report without denying it at all. We are still awaiting an honest account of the NSA’s capabilities. Tell your representative to demand an independent investigation today.
  • 1.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • DETAILS OF HOW TO CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON
    CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON, TELL HIM/HER NO ATTACKS ON SYRIA Find Your Representative Not sure of your congressional district or who your m...
  • WHO USED NAPALM, WHITE PHOSPHORUS,AGENT ORANGE?
    Lets give some context to the use of chemical warfare by Assad. FROM THE PURSUIT OF EXCITEMENT d by:  James Shannon  | November 7, 2011 Napa...
  • HOW TO DRIVE CHRISTIAN RIGHT WINGERS NUTS
    OBVIOUSLY ONE NEED NOT BE A "SOCIALIST" (WHATEVER THAT IS, I KNOW AT LEAST EIGHT DIFFERENT IMPORTANT VARIETIES) TO USE  THE BIBLIC...
  • TEA PARTY TO McCONNELL:VOTE TO BOMB, YOU'RE TOAST
    FROM MOTHER JONES Kentucky Tea Partiers to Mitch McConnell: Vote to Bomb Syria and You're Toast Why the debate has the Senate minority l...
  • LATEST, BREAKING NEWS ON SYRIA: HOUSE HEARINGS
    FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES In Hearing, House Panel Seems Split on Syria Strike By  MICHAEL R. GORDON  and  THOM SHANKER Published: September 4,...
  • U.S. WILL KILL CIVILIANS TO PROTECT CIVILIANS!!
    FROM IADL Killing Civilians to Protect Civilians in Syria By Marjorie Cohn and Jeanne Mirer August 28, 2013 " Information Clearing Hous...
  • 5 EXAMPLES OF DUMB GREENWASHING
    FROM INHABITAT.COM WHEN NEXT EARTH DAY ROLLS AROUND WILL THE 5 DUMBEST GREEN WASHED GIMMICKS SURPASS THESE? Top Five Dumbest Greenwashed ...
  • MEDIA CHEERLEADS FOR WAR, WANTS ATTACK NOW
    FROM THINK PROGRESS Media Cheerleads For Another War: Blasts Obama For Not Rushing Into Syria BY  IGOR VOLSKY  ON  SEPTEMBER 1, 2013 AT 12:3...
  • TOXIC RESULT OF FALLUJAH WORSE THAN HIROSHIMA
    FROM CLIMATE AND CAPITALISM Posted on  September 2, 2013 Toxic legacy of US assault on Fallujah 'worse than Hiroshima' More proof th...
  • 3 REASONS CONGRESS MAY NOT APPROVE WAR IN SYRIA
    FROM TIME MAGAZINE SYRIA Three Reasons Congress May Not Approve War In Syria Obama has challenged Congress to approve action in Syria, it’s ...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (139)
    • ▼  August (361)
      • 3 REASONS CONGRESS MAY NOT APPROVE WAR IN SYRIA
      • GOING TO CONGRESS DOESN'T CHANGE MERITS OF ARGUMENT
      • WELFARE INSANITY: BANNING DRUG OFFENDERS FROM FOOD...
      • MAN CHARGED WITH FELONY FOR PEACEFUL PROTESTING
      • TAKE ACTION HERE: REMOVE SEXIST, STUPID JUDGE
      • SEN. WHO WANTS TEACHERS ARMED, SHOOTS TEACHER
      • MANUFACTURING CONSENT, AMERICAN STYLE
      • WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE ARGUMENTS FOR WAR ON SYRIA?
      • DEREGULATION HAS SPAWNED WALL STREET RACKETEERS
      • MAN SHOOTS SELF, BLAMES HOODIE-WEARERS
      • THE CASE AGAINST AIRSTRIKES ON SYRIA
      • DETAILS OF HOW TO CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON
      • NANCY PELOSI, WAR HAWK-HERE'S HOW TO CONTACT HER
      • SMALL ESSAY: RISKS OF STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA
      • LATEST-OBAMA SEEKS CONGRESS. VOTE ON SYRIA
      • HOUSE IS THE LEGISLATIVE EQUIVALENT OF N. KOREA
      • TOM FRIEDMAN'S BIZARRE FANTASY
      • BEFORE HE PULLS TRIGGER, QUESTIONS FOR THE PRES. A...
      • JUST 1% OF TOP-PAID CEOS ARE WOMEN
      • RISING CO2 COULD DEVASTATE SEAS
      • HOW THE RESTAURANT LOBBY KEEPS WORKERS IN POVERTY
      • 80% OF AMERICANS SAY GET CONGRESS TO APPROVE SYRIA...
      • A LITTLE ESSAY ON WHY THE SOUTH IS SO MESSED UP
      • RUTH BADER GINSBURG WILL MARRY GAYS
      • NEED A DEFINITION & EXAMPLE OF GREENWASHING?
      • 5 EXAMPLES OF DUMB GREENWASHING
      • WHY "INVESTIGATIONS" OF NSA SPYING DON'T SUCCEED
      • NSA MISLEADS PUBLIC W/O TECHNICALLY LYING
      • CHEMICAL HYPOCRISY: US AIDED IRAQI NERVE ATTACKS
      • PBS'S NEWS HOUR CAN BE JUST SO VAPID
      • THE POLITICS OF NULLIFICATION ON GUN CONTROL
      • NYPD LABELS MOSQUES AS TERROR GROUPS!!
      • LONE RANGER OBAMA MAY GO IT ALONE ON SYRIA
      • NO MORE UNDECLARED WARS
      • SIGN HERE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR FOOD WORKERS
      • ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK, EPISODE 6
      • FLORIDA CONSIDERS ELIMINATING ALL LAWS
      • CHRISTIE FORCED OUT OF GOP RACE,TOO EMPATHETIC
      • DANGLING QUESTIONS ON SYRIAN WAR
      • 5 REASONS WHY FAST FOOD DESERVES TO DIE
      • CAN'T COMPARE FED. BUDGET TO HOUSEHOLD BUDGET
      • MAN REALIZES HE'S BEEN READING FAKE NEWS FOR 25 YRS
      • DREAMERS CUT OUT FROM MARCH ON WASHINGTON
      • GOP PLANS ON SLOW DEATH OF IMMIGRATION REFORM
      • THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND THE SLOWLY BOLING FROG
      • WOMEN: WHAT DOES OBAMACARE MEAN FOR YOU?
      • DOJ SURRENDERS ON LEGAL WEED
      • OBAMA: ACTION IN SYRIA HAS NO OBJECTIVE WHATSOEVER.
      • GOP ABSENT FROM MARCH ON WASHINGTON
      • PAT ROBERTSON: GAYS WILL CUT YOU TO GIVE YOU AIDS
      • PEPSI CO. SETTLE CLASS ACTION SUIT-FALSE ADVERTISING
      • WILL ROBOTS BE MAKING YOUR BIG MACS?
      • A COALITION OF THE POOR AND MIDDLE CLASS? HUMM!
      • THE FBI'S WAR ON REV. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
      • WHY THE RUSH TO BOMB SYRIA?
      • WEST DEFILES MARTIN LUTHER KING'S MEMORY
      • EXXON CHANGES COURSE AFTER PR DISASTER
      • GRANNIES ARRESTED BY BRAVE COPS-JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS
      • HOW BIG CORPORATIONS ARE UNPATRIOTIC
      • SOCIALISM IS A MATTER OF DEFINITION AND DEGREE
      • WHO ARE TOP 2 AMERICAN COLLEGES? NO, NOT HARVARD ...
      • WHICH GOP PRESIDENT PROPOSED GUARANTEED MIN.INCOME?
      • U.S. WILL KILL CIVILIANS TO PROTECT CIVILIANS!!
      • UNLESS THREAT TO NATION, NO ATTACK SAID OBAMA
      • DOES OBAMA KNOW HE'S FIGHTING ON AL-QA'IDA'S SIDE?
      • MLK WANTED GUARANTEED BASIC INCOME-OBAMA DOESN'T
      • SYRIA STRIKE TURNS U.S. INTO AL QAEDA'S AIR FORCE
      • WORST CASE SCENARIO HAS COME TO FUKUSHIMA
      • LAWSUT AGAINST THE DONALD, HE TRUMPED UP THINGS
      • WANT CONGRESS TO DEBATE ABOUT SYRIA? TAKE ACTION HERE
      • MAIN SPEAKERS AT MARCH ON WASHINGTON BETRAY MLK
      • ROBERT SCHEER:"I'VE NEVER LIKED GOVERNMENT." VIDEO
      • COMMENT FROM BILL HESSELL,ON SYRIA
      • U.S. MEDIA BEATS THE DRUMS OF WAR
      • 54 ABORTION PROVIDERS IN 27 STATES CLOSED- AUDIO
      • VOTING RESTRICTION LAWS WILL BACKFIRE ON GOP
      • CONGRESSIONAL PROCESS BROKEN-IT CAN BE FIXED
      • CONTRACTOR KGB WILL HAVE TRIAL FOR HUMAN TRAFFICKING
      • IS THERE A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST MAJORITY IN U.S.?
      • GOD DOES NOT LISTEN TO RICK PERRY'S PRAYERS
      • CLIMATE CHANGE IS DRIVING FORCE BEHIND WILDFIRES
      • 10-YEAR-OLD TEXAS GIRL CHARGED WITH RAPE
      • THERE WERE DINOSAURS IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN
      • NO CLIMATE CHANGE.MUST BE SO, COBURN SAYS SO
      • WATCH IT! THE NSA IS SPYING ON YOUR SEX LIFE
      • AMERICANS ARE TOO STUPID FOR DEMOCRACY
      • STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA COULD BE COUNTERPRODUCTIVE
      • THE RACIST SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN! INCREDIBLE!
      • INTERESTING POINT OF VIEW ON INTERVENTION IN SYRIA
      • WHY AMERICAN SHOULD INTERVENE IN SYRIA
      • U.S.HELPED SADDAM HUSSEIN AS HE GASSED IRAN
      • WHATEVER OBAMA DECIDES ABOUT SYRIA, HE LOSES
      • WHO USED NAPALM, WHITE PHOSPHORUS,AGENT ORANGE?
      • CHEMICAL WARFARE FROM A.D. 256 TO A.D. 20013
      • 5 REASONS THE U.S. SHOULD INTERVENE IN SYRIA
      • IS THE DEP'T OF DEFENSE SOMETIMES NUTS?
      • IRAQ WAS FOR OIL, AGAINST SYRIA FOR NATURAL GAS
      • HAWK, IN EFFECT, ARGUES WE SHOULD ATTACK SYRIA
      • PROS AND CONS ABOUT LIMITED STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA
      • U.S. CAN FIGHT WAR W/0 CONGRESS IS TIME MAG. CRAP
Powered by Blogger.