WHISTLEBLOWERS

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, August 24, 2013

POTENTIAL GOP PRES. CANDIDATE TED CRUZ, FULL OF IT

Posted on 1:45 PM by Unknown

FROM FACTCHECK.ORG-----------THE WIRE


Sen. Ted Cruz says there will be “20 or 30 million” people living in the U.S. illegally “in another 10, 20 years” if the Senate immigration bill becomes law. But the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says the bill, if enacted, will reduce future illegal immigration by 33 percent to 50 percent compared with current law.
The Republican freshman senator from Texas offered his estimate on ABC’s “This Week,” while discussing the impact of the bill on the political future of one of its sponsors, Republican Sen. Marco Rubio.
Cruz, July 21: If the Gang of Eight bill became the law, in another 10, 20 years, we wouldn’t have 11 million people here illegally, we’d have 20 or 30 million.
We asked the senator’s office to support that statement. His spokesman, Sean Rushton, said that “it was not a factual statement — it was an opinion.”
Rushton, July 23: Senator Cruz’s statement cannot possibly be fact-checked, because it was not a factual statement — it was an opinion. Sen. Cruz obviously cannot cite any “facts” about what the level of illegal immigration will be in 10 or 20 years. He made a prediction about future levels of illegal immigration based on contingent future events, so there are no data that can prove or disprove this statement. Any attempt to assess the truth or falsity of this statement would simply be political editorializing, rather than an assessment of the validity of empirical, factual statements about the world as it exists today.
Nobody can predict the future, but there is a nonpartisan congressional office that produces reports for members of Congress to consider when making policy decisions. We’re referring, of course, to the Congressional Budget Office, which was created by Congress in 1974 to provide “impartial information about budgetary and economic issues,” CBO says. And CBO estimates that in 10 years there would be 6.4 million “future unauthorized residents” without the legislation and 4 million with it — a “net decline in future unauthorized residents” of 37.5 percent.
We arrived at those numbers by reviewing two different CBO reports.
In a June 18 report, CBO said on table 2 (page 15) that there would be a “net decline in future unauthorized residents” of 1.6 million by 2023 and 2.5 million by 2033 under the bill as approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee. That report also said “the net annual flow of unauthorized residents would decrease by about 25 percent relative to what would occur under current law.” That means the CBO projects there would be 6.4 million more residents living in the U.S. illegally in 2023 and 10 million more in 2033 under current law, but those numbers would drop to 4.8 million in 2023 and 7.5 million in 2033 under the bill as approved by the committee.
That’s far less than the “20 or 30 million” people that Cruz says will be living illegally in the U.S. “in another 10, 20 years” if the Senate immigration bill becomes law.
But that’s not all. The bill was amended on the Senate floor to add more funds for border security, and as a result, CBO, in a July 3 letter to the committee chairman, said “the number of unauthorized residents in 2023 would be lower by about 800,000.”
So, CBO now projects the total “net decline in future unauthorized residents” would be 2.4 million by 2023 if the latest version of the Senate bill becomes law. That means, in 10 years there would be 4 million “future unauthorized residents” under the Senate-passed bill — a “net decline in future unauthorized residents” of 37.5 percent from the 6.4 million CBO projects under current law. (The CBO did not provide a revised figure for 2033.)
These are not facts, but they are projections from the nonpartisan source Congress uses in making policy decisions. And these projections indicate that Cruz’s statement is way off base.
After saying there is “no data that can prove or disprove this statement,” Rushton went on to say that the senator’s figures are conservative — if you consider what happened after the last time the nation overhauled the immigration laws, in 1986. He’s referring to theImmigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan and provided legal status to about 3 million people who had been living in the U.S. illegally.
Rushton, July 23: Basic arithmetic shows that in the 27 years after the United States offered amnesty to those here illegally without guaranteeing border security, illegal immigration increased by 367% — from 3 million to 11 million. … A 367% increase in illegal immigration from the current 11 million would equal just over 40 million. Senator Cruz’s statement predicted that level would rise to 20 or 30 million, so it’s a conservative estimate based on historical experience.
Rushton’s math is wrong and his logic is lacking.
True, there are about 11 million people living in the U.S. illegally. The Pew Hispanic Center estimates there were 11.1 million people living in the U.S. illegally in 2011, down from 12 million in 2007. And it is widely accepted — including by the Senate Judiciary Committee — that the 1986 immigration law resulted in the legalization of about 3 million people. So those figures are correct. But that’s a 267 percent increase from 1986, not 367 percent.
More important, Rushton’s logic assumes the conditions for illegal immigration are the same today as they were in 1986 and that will result in the same outcome. That’s a flawed assumption.
Let’s consider border security. In 1986, there were 3,000 border agents in the Southwest and “technology at that time consisted literally of hand held flashlights, Vietnam-era sensors, very little lighting on the border, and certainly none of the outstanding technology that our agents work with today,” according to the May 22 congressional testimony of David V. Aguilar, a retired acting commissioner of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection who said he “spent 35 years working the borders of our country at many levels within the organizations responsible for the security of those borders.”
Today, he said, the nation has “unprecedented resources” at the border. Aguilar testified that there are more than 21,000 border patrol agents, “the highest level in its 88-year history”; there are more than 650 miles of border fence; and technology includes “integrated fixed towers, mobile surveillance units, and thermal imaging systems.”
The Senate-passed bill would double those numbers, adding 20,000 border agents and 700 miles of fencing, as a result of an amendment passed on the Senate floor by a 69-29 votewith Republican support.
And, as we saw in the CBO projections, enhancing border security is expected to make a difference in the flow of immigrants who cross the border illegally in the future.
– Eugene Kiely, with Madeleine Stevens
Tags:Illegal immigrationimmigrationTed Cruz
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WHO USED NAPALM, WHITE PHOSPHORUS,AGENT ORANGE?
    Lets give some context to the use of chemical warfare by Assad. FROM THE PURSUIT OF EXCITEMENT d by:  James Shannon  | November 7, 2011 Napa...
  • DETAILS OF HOW TO CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON
    CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON, TELL HIM/HER NO ATTACKS ON SYRIA Find Your Representative Not sure of your congressional district or who your m...
  • SMALL ESSAY: RISKS OF STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA
    BY BILL HESSELL, Ph.D Dangling questions indeed, the answers to which loudly proclaim "Don't do it!".  Obama claims a missile ...
  • TAKE ACTION HERE: REMOVE SEXIST, STUPID JUDGE
    FROM CARE2 At a hearing in Montana yesterday, a judge sentenced a teacher to just 30 days in jail for repeatedly raping a 14-year-old studen...
  • WHO ARE THE SYRIAN REBELS? DETAILS. AUDIO
      Not enough emphasis here on rebel inks to al-Queda affiliates but more on that in another post.                 LISTEN TO FULL PROGRAM  FR...
  • LATEST, BREAKING NEWS ON SYRIA: HOUSE HEARINGS
    FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES In Hearing, House Panel Seems Split on Syria Strike By  MICHAEL R. GORDON  and  THOM SHANKER Published: September 4,...
  • WOULD THE "JUST WAR" DOCTRINE JUSTIFY AN ATTACK?
    FROM RELIGION NEWS SERVICE I WENT TO CHURCH TODAY ( WHICH WILL, NO DOUBT SURPRISE SOME READERS OF THIS BLOG) AND THE PRIEST PRAYED THAT, IF ...
  • MEDIA CHEERLEADS FOR WAR, WANTS ATTACK NOW
    FROM THINK PROGRESS Media Cheerleads For Another War: Blasts Obama For Not Rushing Into Syria BY  IGOR VOLSKY  ON  SEPTEMBER 1, 2013 AT 12:3...
  • OUR EGREGIOUS E PLURIBUS UNUM
    This guy is really pissed off! FROM CHRIS FLOYD'S EMPIRE BURLESQUE United We Fall: Our Egregious E Pluribus Unum WRITTEN BY CHRIS FLOYD ...
  • A LITTLE ESSAY ON WHY THE SOUTH IS SO MESSED UP
    THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN The Civil War was not only fought to preserve the Union, but it was a fight to preserve state's rights. Know a...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (139)
    • ▼  August (361)
      • 3 REASONS CONGRESS MAY NOT APPROVE WAR IN SYRIA
      • GOING TO CONGRESS DOESN'T CHANGE MERITS OF ARGUMENT
      • WELFARE INSANITY: BANNING DRUG OFFENDERS FROM FOOD...
      • MAN CHARGED WITH FELONY FOR PEACEFUL PROTESTING
      • TAKE ACTION HERE: REMOVE SEXIST, STUPID JUDGE
      • SEN. WHO WANTS TEACHERS ARMED, SHOOTS TEACHER
      • MANUFACTURING CONSENT, AMERICAN STYLE
      • WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE ARGUMENTS FOR WAR ON SYRIA?
      • DEREGULATION HAS SPAWNED WALL STREET RACKETEERS
      • MAN SHOOTS SELF, BLAMES HOODIE-WEARERS
      • THE CASE AGAINST AIRSTRIKES ON SYRIA
      • DETAILS OF HOW TO CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON
      • NANCY PELOSI, WAR HAWK-HERE'S HOW TO CONTACT HER
      • SMALL ESSAY: RISKS OF STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA
      • LATEST-OBAMA SEEKS CONGRESS. VOTE ON SYRIA
      • HOUSE IS THE LEGISLATIVE EQUIVALENT OF N. KOREA
      • TOM FRIEDMAN'S BIZARRE FANTASY
      • BEFORE HE PULLS TRIGGER, QUESTIONS FOR THE PRES. A...
      • JUST 1% OF TOP-PAID CEOS ARE WOMEN
      • RISING CO2 COULD DEVASTATE SEAS
      • HOW THE RESTAURANT LOBBY KEEPS WORKERS IN POVERTY
      • 80% OF AMERICANS SAY GET CONGRESS TO APPROVE SYRIA...
      • A LITTLE ESSAY ON WHY THE SOUTH IS SO MESSED UP
      • RUTH BADER GINSBURG WILL MARRY GAYS
      • NEED A DEFINITION & EXAMPLE OF GREENWASHING?
      • 5 EXAMPLES OF DUMB GREENWASHING
      • WHY "INVESTIGATIONS" OF NSA SPYING DON'T SUCCEED
      • NSA MISLEADS PUBLIC W/O TECHNICALLY LYING
      • CHEMICAL HYPOCRISY: US AIDED IRAQI NERVE ATTACKS
      • PBS'S NEWS HOUR CAN BE JUST SO VAPID
      • THE POLITICS OF NULLIFICATION ON GUN CONTROL
      • NYPD LABELS MOSQUES AS TERROR GROUPS!!
      • LONE RANGER OBAMA MAY GO IT ALONE ON SYRIA
      • NO MORE UNDECLARED WARS
      • SIGN HERE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR FOOD WORKERS
      • ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK, EPISODE 6
      • FLORIDA CONSIDERS ELIMINATING ALL LAWS
      • CHRISTIE FORCED OUT OF GOP RACE,TOO EMPATHETIC
      • DANGLING QUESTIONS ON SYRIAN WAR
      • 5 REASONS WHY FAST FOOD DESERVES TO DIE
      • CAN'T COMPARE FED. BUDGET TO HOUSEHOLD BUDGET
      • MAN REALIZES HE'S BEEN READING FAKE NEWS FOR 25 YRS
      • DREAMERS CUT OUT FROM MARCH ON WASHINGTON
      • GOP PLANS ON SLOW DEATH OF IMMIGRATION REFORM
      • THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND THE SLOWLY BOLING FROG
      • WOMEN: WHAT DOES OBAMACARE MEAN FOR YOU?
      • DOJ SURRENDERS ON LEGAL WEED
      • OBAMA: ACTION IN SYRIA HAS NO OBJECTIVE WHATSOEVER.
      • GOP ABSENT FROM MARCH ON WASHINGTON
      • PAT ROBERTSON: GAYS WILL CUT YOU TO GIVE YOU AIDS
      • PEPSI CO. SETTLE CLASS ACTION SUIT-FALSE ADVERTISING
      • WILL ROBOTS BE MAKING YOUR BIG MACS?
      • A COALITION OF THE POOR AND MIDDLE CLASS? HUMM!
      • THE FBI'S WAR ON REV. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
      • WHY THE RUSH TO BOMB SYRIA?
      • WEST DEFILES MARTIN LUTHER KING'S MEMORY
      • EXXON CHANGES COURSE AFTER PR DISASTER
      • GRANNIES ARRESTED BY BRAVE COPS-JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS
      • HOW BIG CORPORATIONS ARE UNPATRIOTIC
      • SOCIALISM IS A MATTER OF DEFINITION AND DEGREE
      • WHO ARE TOP 2 AMERICAN COLLEGES? NO, NOT HARVARD ...
      • WHICH GOP PRESIDENT PROPOSED GUARANTEED MIN.INCOME?
      • U.S. WILL KILL CIVILIANS TO PROTECT CIVILIANS!!
      • UNLESS THREAT TO NATION, NO ATTACK SAID OBAMA
      • DOES OBAMA KNOW HE'S FIGHTING ON AL-QA'IDA'S SIDE?
      • MLK WANTED GUARANTEED BASIC INCOME-OBAMA DOESN'T
      • SYRIA STRIKE TURNS U.S. INTO AL QAEDA'S AIR FORCE
      • WORST CASE SCENARIO HAS COME TO FUKUSHIMA
      • LAWSUT AGAINST THE DONALD, HE TRUMPED UP THINGS
      • WANT CONGRESS TO DEBATE ABOUT SYRIA? TAKE ACTION HERE
      • MAIN SPEAKERS AT MARCH ON WASHINGTON BETRAY MLK
      • ROBERT SCHEER:"I'VE NEVER LIKED GOVERNMENT." VIDEO
      • COMMENT FROM BILL HESSELL,ON SYRIA
      • U.S. MEDIA BEATS THE DRUMS OF WAR
      • 54 ABORTION PROVIDERS IN 27 STATES CLOSED- AUDIO
      • VOTING RESTRICTION LAWS WILL BACKFIRE ON GOP
      • CONGRESSIONAL PROCESS BROKEN-IT CAN BE FIXED
      • CONTRACTOR KGB WILL HAVE TRIAL FOR HUMAN TRAFFICKING
      • IS THERE A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST MAJORITY IN U.S.?
      • GOD DOES NOT LISTEN TO RICK PERRY'S PRAYERS
      • CLIMATE CHANGE IS DRIVING FORCE BEHIND WILDFIRES
      • 10-YEAR-OLD TEXAS GIRL CHARGED WITH RAPE
      • THERE WERE DINOSAURS IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN
      • NO CLIMATE CHANGE.MUST BE SO, COBURN SAYS SO
      • WATCH IT! THE NSA IS SPYING ON YOUR SEX LIFE
      • AMERICANS ARE TOO STUPID FOR DEMOCRACY
      • STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA COULD BE COUNTERPRODUCTIVE
      • THE RACIST SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN! INCREDIBLE!
      • INTERESTING POINT OF VIEW ON INTERVENTION IN SYRIA
      • WHY AMERICAN SHOULD INTERVENE IN SYRIA
      • U.S.HELPED SADDAM HUSSEIN AS HE GASSED IRAN
      • WHATEVER OBAMA DECIDES ABOUT SYRIA, HE LOSES
      • WHO USED NAPALM, WHITE PHOSPHORUS,AGENT ORANGE?
      • CHEMICAL WARFARE FROM A.D. 256 TO A.D. 20013
      • 5 REASONS THE U.S. SHOULD INTERVENE IN SYRIA
      • IS THE DEP'T OF DEFENSE SOMETIMES NUTS?
      • IRAQ WAS FOR OIL, AGAINST SYRIA FOR NATURAL GAS
      • HAWK, IN EFFECT, ARGUES WE SHOULD ATTACK SYRIA
      • PROS AND CONS ABOUT LIMITED STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA
      • U.S. CAN FIGHT WAR W/0 CONGRESS IS TIME MAG. CRAP
Powered by Blogger.