WHISTLEBLOWERS

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, August 11, 2013

WHAT IF FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR FALLOUT HAD BEEN IN US?

Posted on 4:06 PM by Unknown

FROM NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL

What if the Fukushima nuclear fallout crisis had happened here?


Map data ©2013 Google, INEGI, MapLink - Terms of Use
Report a map error

Map
Satellite
These radioactive plumes from severe nuclear accidents were calculated by NRDC based on the actual weather patterns of March 11-12, 2011. The result on any given day will vary according to the type of reactor accident and on the prevailing weather patterns at the time.
These five nuclear power plants had emergency shutdowns in 2011:
  • Calvert Cliffs - Lusby, MD (due to hurricane)
  • North Anna - Louisa, VA (due to earthquake)
  • Ft Calhoun - Ft Calhoun, NE (due to flooding)
  • Browns Ferry - Athens, AL (due to tornado)
  • Surry - Surry, VA (due to tornado)
There are 104 nuclear reactors in the United States. If one of them lost both primary and backup power for even a matter of hours, it could lead to a meltdown and an airborne radioactive plume. See what could have happened if a reactor in your area had a severe nuclear accident on March 11, 2011.info
 
  

Legend

  • Threshold for Radiation Sickness (75 rads)*
  • Maximum Radiation Dose Recommended for Emergency Responders (25 rads)*
  • Evacuation Recommended (5 rads)*
  • Sheltering Recommended (1 rad)*
  • 10-mile Evacuation Zoneinfo
  • 50-mile Potential Contamination Zoneinfo
* Acute radiation dose based on 48 hour exposure, assuming no sheltering. Sheltering can reduce radiation dose by a factor of ten or more.

Why U.S. nuclear power plants are vulnerable to severe accident with nuclear fallout

A future severe nuclear accident at a U.S. nuclear power plant is a real possibility. In 2011 five nuclear power plants in the United States lost primary power due to earthquake or extreme weather events, including tornados, hurricanes, and flooding. Fortunately backup power systems kicked in at these plants and a disaster was averted. But weather is not the only risk factor. Other risk factors include:
  • Type of reactor – There are two types of reactors operating it the United States: Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs) and Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs). Some experts judge that the design and structure of BWRs do not protect against the release of radiation during a severe accident as effectively as PWRs. The four reactors involved in the Fukushima nuclear crisis were BWRs. On the map, NRDC experts assigned a red flag to a reactor if it is a BWR.
  • Age of reactor – Reactors were designed to operate for 40 years, yet the regulatory body that oversees nuclear safety in the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, has re-licensed some nuclear power plants to operate for 60 years, well beyond their originally engineered design lifetime. On the map, NRDC experts assigned a red flag to a reactor if the NRC has approved the reactor to operate for 60 years.
  • Power level of reactor – The NRC has approved many utility operators to increase the operating power of their nuclear reactors, including for Fukushima-type reactors, and in some cases multiple times and to significantly higher power levels. These so-called "power uprates" push reactors beyond what they were originally engineered to do, and could increase the radiation hazard if a nuclear accident occurred. On the map, NRDC experts assigned a red flag if the NRC has granted a reactor a power uprate.
If a person received one rad of radiation from a nuclear accident, it would increase one's chance of getting cancer by 1 in 1,000 (averaged over all ages and both sexes). And although the NRC believes that the chances of a severe accident with fallout in a core meltdown for any one of the 104 U.S. nuclear reactors is small (probability of less than 1 in 10,000 per year), can we afford the risk? Millions of Japanese people were exposed to radiation from Fukushima, increasing their risk of developing cancer, and the cost of the Fukushima accident is projected to exceed US$100 billion, and the environmental effects will last for generations. What if a meltdown occurred at one of the 65 nuclear power plants in the United States?

Why we need urgent federal action to reduce the risks of U.S. nuclear accident fallout

With 6 million Americans living within 10 miles of a U.S. nuclear power plant – the evacuation zone defined by the federal government – and more than 120 million Americans living within 50 miles of a U.S. nuclear power plant – the distance the U.S. government told Americans to evacuate from the area around the Fukushima plant – we cannot afford to stand by and hope the worst won't happen here, especially with extreme weather intensifying around the globe.
Red flags for heightened risk factors of a severe nuclear accident abound in the United States. Currently 23 U.S. nuclear reactors are the same type of reactor, a boiling water reactor (BWRs), which was involved in the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Some BWRs are operating near major American cities like Philadlephia. Nearly all of the 104 nuclear reactors operating in the United States were designed and built three to four decades ago. Despite being originally engineered for a 40-year lifespan, the NRC has approved 71 reactors at 32 nuclear power plants to operate for 60 years. And 90 percent of U.S. nuclear reactors have had their operating power increased beyond the original design engineered for them.
Yet the NRC hasn't yet made a single U.S. nuclear power plant any safer than it was since the Fukushima accident about one year ago. After the Fukushima disaster, a task force assembled by the commission's chairman identified a list of safety improvements including top tier items to be "started without unnecessary delay." But these important safety upgrades are still years away from being implemented, if ever. In fact, some of these safety improvements have been on the commission's to-do list since the 1990s.

What happens in a severe nuclear accident like at Fukushima

Even after the nuclear chain reaction at a power plant is stopped by its operators, the reactor core still needs to be continually cooled, or the fuel rods will rupture and melt from the remaining radioactive decay heat. And if the level of cooling water falls below the core, the metal sheaths containing the uranium in the fuel rods will react with steam, producing explosive hydrogen gas. Therefore if power to run reactor core cooling is lost just for a matter of hours, it can lead to a meltdown – potentially releasing plumes of radioactive material into the air.
In Fukushima an earthquake caused the regional electric grid to go down, cutting off the nuclear plant's primary power. Then a tsunami flooded the low-lying diesel generators that were in place to provide backup power. Without power to cool the cores of its three fueled reactors, the severe accident at Fukushima began. Operators had to vent radioactive gases into the air in an attempt to reduce mounting pressure inside the reactor vessels. Hydrogen gas ignited and exploded in the reactor buildings, spewing plumes of radiation. Some of this fallout was blown out to sea by prevailing winds, but a plume of intense radiation spread northwest from the stricken plant for more than 50 miles. Because of the radioactive materials deposited by the plume, including cesium-137 and strontium-90, large areas in Fukushima Prefecture will be uninhabitable for generations. Lower levels of radiation drifted across other Japanese states and as far as Tokyo.

NRDC's methodology for building the U.S. nuclear fallout map

NRDC's nuclear fallout calculations were made using the weather reports from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for the specific days of March 11, 2011 and March 12, 2011. Using this historical weather data from the first days of the Fukushima accident, NRDC modeled where the radiation plumes released at Fukushima would have spread if it were a U.S. nuclear reactor that had melted down. For this work NRDC used the Department of Defense computer model "HPAC" – Hazard Prediction Assessment Capability. Some of the fallout patterns extend far from the nuclear plant, carried by strong winds blowing on those days. At other plants where the air was still in mid-March 2011, the fallout hovered over and settled on the vicinity of the plant. In our computer model of these severe nuclear accidents, the accident takes place over the course of two days with multiple releases of radiation, similar to what happened at Fukushima. As the wind changed direction over that period of time the fallout may be carried in different directions from the plant. Also shown in NRDC's map are the U.S.-government defined 10-mile evacuation zone, and 50-mile zones where the potential for land contamination would still be high in a severe nuclear accident.

Key Resources

  • Limerick Nuclear Plant's Re-Licensing Application Circumvents Safety Analysis Requirements
  • Indian Point Nuclear Plant Study: Nuclear Plant Not Needed to Keep New York State Powered
More Sharing ServicesShare|Share on twitter
|

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WHO USED NAPALM, WHITE PHOSPHORUS,AGENT ORANGE?
    Lets give some context to the use of chemical warfare by Assad. FROM THE PURSUIT OF EXCITEMENT d by:  James Shannon  | November 7, 2011 Napa...
  • DETAILS OF HOW TO CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON
    CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON, TELL HIM/HER NO ATTACKS ON SYRIA Find Your Representative Not sure of your congressional district or who your m...
  • SMALL ESSAY: RISKS OF STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA
    BY BILL HESSELL, Ph.D Dangling questions indeed, the answers to which loudly proclaim "Don't do it!".  Obama claims a missile ...
  • TAKE ACTION HERE: REMOVE SEXIST, STUPID JUDGE
    FROM CARE2 At a hearing in Montana yesterday, a judge sentenced a teacher to just 30 days in jail for repeatedly raping a 14-year-old studen...
  • WHO ARE THE SYRIAN REBELS? DETAILS. AUDIO
      Not enough emphasis here on rebel inks to al-Queda affiliates but more on that in another post.                 LISTEN TO FULL PROGRAM  FR...
  • LATEST, BREAKING NEWS ON SYRIA: HOUSE HEARINGS
    FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES In Hearing, House Panel Seems Split on Syria Strike By  MICHAEL R. GORDON  and  THOM SHANKER Published: September 4,...
  • WOULD THE "JUST WAR" DOCTRINE JUSTIFY AN ATTACK?
    FROM RELIGION NEWS SERVICE I WENT TO CHURCH TODAY ( WHICH WILL, NO DOUBT SURPRISE SOME READERS OF THIS BLOG) AND THE PRIEST PRAYED THAT, IF ...
  • MEDIA CHEERLEADS FOR WAR, WANTS ATTACK NOW
    FROM THINK PROGRESS Media Cheerleads For Another War: Blasts Obama For Not Rushing Into Syria BY  IGOR VOLSKY  ON  SEPTEMBER 1, 2013 AT 12:3...
  • OUR EGREGIOUS E PLURIBUS UNUM
    This guy is really pissed off! FROM CHRIS FLOYD'S EMPIRE BURLESQUE United We Fall: Our Egregious E Pluribus Unum WRITTEN BY CHRIS FLOYD ...
  • A LITTLE ESSAY ON WHY THE SOUTH IS SO MESSED UP
    THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN The Civil War was not only fought to preserve the Union, but it was a fight to preserve state's rights. Know a...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (139)
    • ▼  August (361)
      • 3 REASONS CONGRESS MAY NOT APPROVE WAR IN SYRIA
      • GOING TO CONGRESS DOESN'T CHANGE MERITS OF ARGUMENT
      • WELFARE INSANITY: BANNING DRUG OFFENDERS FROM FOOD...
      • MAN CHARGED WITH FELONY FOR PEACEFUL PROTESTING
      • TAKE ACTION HERE: REMOVE SEXIST, STUPID JUDGE
      • SEN. WHO WANTS TEACHERS ARMED, SHOOTS TEACHER
      • MANUFACTURING CONSENT, AMERICAN STYLE
      • WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE ARGUMENTS FOR WAR ON SYRIA?
      • DEREGULATION HAS SPAWNED WALL STREET RACKETEERS
      • MAN SHOOTS SELF, BLAMES HOODIE-WEARERS
      • THE CASE AGAINST AIRSTRIKES ON SYRIA
      • DETAILS OF HOW TO CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSPERSON
      • NANCY PELOSI, WAR HAWK-HERE'S HOW TO CONTACT HER
      • SMALL ESSAY: RISKS OF STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA
      • LATEST-OBAMA SEEKS CONGRESS. VOTE ON SYRIA
      • HOUSE IS THE LEGISLATIVE EQUIVALENT OF N. KOREA
      • TOM FRIEDMAN'S BIZARRE FANTASY
      • BEFORE HE PULLS TRIGGER, QUESTIONS FOR THE PRES. A...
      • JUST 1% OF TOP-PAID CEOS ARE WOMEN
      • RISING CO2 COULD DEVASTATE SEAS
      • HOW THE RESTAURANT LOBBY KEEPS WORKERS IN POVERTY
      • 80% OF AMERICANS SAY GET CONGRESS TO APPROVE SYRIA...
      • A LITTLE ESSAY ON WHY THE SOUTH IS SO MESSED UP
      • RUTH BADER GINSBURG WILL MARRY GAYS
      • NEED A DEFINITION & EXAMPLE OF GREENWASHING?
      • 5 EXAMPLES OF DUMB GREENWASHING
      • WHY "INVESTIGATIONS" OF NSA SPYING DON'T SUCCEED
      • NSA MISLEADS PUBLIC W/O TECHNICALLY LYING
      • CHEMICAL HYPOCRISY: US AIDED IRAQI NERVE ATTACKS
      • PBS'S NEWS HOUR CAN BE JUST SO VAPID
      • THE POLITICS OF NULLIFICATION ON GUN CONTROL
      • NYPD LABELS MOSQUES AS TERROR GROUPS!!
      • LONE RANGER OBAMA MAY GO IT ALONE ON SYRIA
      • NO MORE UNDECLARED WARS
      • SIGN HERE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR FOOD WORKERS
      • ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK, EPISODE 6
      • FLORIDA CONSIDERS ELIMINATING ALL LAWS
      • CHRISTIE FORCED OUT OF GOP RACE,TOO EMPATHETIC
      • DANGLING QUESTIONS ON SYRIAN WAR
      • 5 REASONS WHY FAST FOOD DESERVES TO DIE
      • CAN'T COMPARE FED. BUDGET TO HOUSEHOLD BUDGET
      • MAN REALIZES HE'S BEEN READING FAKE NEWS FOR 25 YRS
      • DREAMERS CUT OUT FROM MARCH ON WASHINGTON
      • GOP PLANS ON SLOW DEATH OF IMMIGRATION REFORM
      • THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND THE SLOWLY BOLING FROG
      • WOMEN: WHAT DOES OBAMACARE MEAN FOR YOU?
      • DOJ SURRENDERS ON LEGAL WEED
      • OBAMA: ACTION IN SYRIA HAS NO OBJECTIVE WHATSOEVER.
      • GOP ABSENT FROM MARCH ON WASHINGTON
      • PAT ROBERTSON: GAYS WILL CUT YOU TO GIVE YOU AIDS
      • PEPSI CO. SETTLE CLASS ACTION SUIT-FALSE ADVERTISING
      • WILL ROBOTS BE MAKING YOUR BIG MACS?
      • A COALITION OF THE POOR AND MIDDLE CLASS? HUMM!
      • THE FBI'S WAR ON REV. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
      • WHY THE RUSH TO BOMB SYRIA?
      • WEST DEFILES MARTIN LUTHER KING'S MEMORY
      • EXXON CHANGES COURSE AFTER PR DISASTER
      • GRANNIES ARRESTED BY BRAVE COPS-JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS
      • HOW BIG CORPORATIONS ARE UNPATRIOTIC
      • SOCIALISM IS A MATTER OF DEFINITION AND DEGREE
      • WHO ARE TOP 2 AMERICAN COLLEGES? NO, NOT HARVARD ...
      • WHICH GOP PRESIDENT PROPOSED GUARANTEED MIN.INCOME?
      • U.S. WILL KILL CIVILIANS TO PROTECT CIVILIANS!!
      • UNLESS THREAT TO NATION, NO ATTACK SAID OBAMA
      • DOES OBAMA KNOW HE'S FIGHTING ON AL-QA'IDA'S SIDE?
      • MLK WANTED GUARANTEED BASIC INCOME-OBAMA DOESN'T
      • SYRIA STRIKE TURNS U.S. INTO AL QAEDA'S AIR FORCE
      • WORST CASE SCENARIO HAS COME TO FUKUSHIMA
      • LAWSUT AGAINST THE DONALD, HE TRUMPED UP THINGS
      • WANT CONGRESS TO DEBATE ABOUT SYRIA? TAKE ACTION HERE
      • MAIN SPEAKERS AT MARCH ON WASHINGTON BETRAY MLK
      • ROBERT SCHEER:"I'VE NEVER LIKED GOVERNMENT." VIDEO
      • COMMENT FROM BILL HESSELL,ON SYRIA
      • U.S. MEDIA BEATS THE DRUMS OF WAR
      • 54 ABORTION PROVIDERS IN 27 STATES CLOSED- AUDIO
      • VOTING RESTRICTION LAWS WILL BACKFIRE ON GOP
      • CONGRESSIONAL PROCESS BROKEN-IT CAN BE FIXED
      • CONTRACTOR KGB WILL HAVE TRIAL FOR HUMAN TRAFFICKING
      • IS THERE A CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST MAJORITY IN U.S.?
      • GOD DOES NOT LISTEN TO RICK PERRY'S PRAYERS
      • CLIMATE CHANGE IS DRIVING FORCE BEHIND WILDFIRES
      • 10-YEAR-OLD TEXAS GIRL CHARGED WITH RAPE
      • THERE WERE DINOSAURS IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN
      • NO CLIMATE CHANGE.MUST BE SO, COBURN SAYS SO
      • WATCH IT! THE NSA IS SPYING ON YOUR SEX LIFE
      • AMERICANS ARE TOO STUPID FOR DEMOCRACY
      • STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA COULD BE COUNTERPRODUCTIVE
      • THE RACIST SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN! INCREDIBLE!
      • INTERESTING POINT OF VIEW ON INTERVENTION IN SYRIA
      • WHY AMERICAN SHOULD INTERVENE IN SYRIA
      • U.S.HELPED SADDAM HUSSEIN AS HE GASSED IRAN
      • WHATEVER OBAMA DECIDES ABOUT SYRIA, HE LOSES
      • WHO USED NAPALM, WHITE PHOSPHORUS,AGENT ORANGE?
      • CHEMICAL WARFARE FROM A.D. 256 TO A.D. 20013
      • 5 REASONS THE U.S. SHOULD INTERVENE IN SYRIA
      • IS THE DEP'T OF DEFENSE SOMETIMES NUTS?
      • IRAQ WAS FOR OIL, AGAINST SYRIA FOR NATURAL GAS
      • HAWK, IN EFFECT, ARGUES WE SHOULD ATTACK SYRIA
      • PROS AND CONS ABOUT LIMITED STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA
      • U.S. CAN FIGHT WAR W/0 CONGRESS IS TIME MAG. CRAP
Powered by Blogger.